buckydewitts:

i love it when ppl try to use the excuse ‘but it’s set in europe’, ‘they’re european of course they’re white!!’, to defend lack of diversity/whitewashing in a piece of media. Like, there have been POC in europe since before the roman empire, get ur head out of ur arse and stop imagining europe as your white supremacist utopia. 

i'm white. does that make me bad?

grrspit:

atchka:

grrspit:

lisawithabee:

afro-dominicano:

yea

p much

Why do white people ask questions like this?  Whenever I get this question, or the thematically similar “Do you hate white people” I just answer with “yes”.

Because that’s the only answer they want to hear.

In context, it makes sense. To a lot of white people, being black IS bad. You can see this evident when a white person tells a black person that they’re “one of the good ones.”

Whites allow for nuances in character for their own race. Rarely are white people grouped into “good” and “bad” categories. You can be a white person who is mostly good, then makes a terrible, terrible decision, but your lifetime of goodness mitigates that bad decision. In other words, white people accept that other white people are complicated and people are the sum of their choices, not merely a reflection of a “good” or “bad” moment.

But Whites LOVE to categorize Blacks as “good” and “bad.” You just have to look at the coverage of Trayvon Martin to see that the fact that he was arrested for smoking pot clearly put him in the “bad” camp right away. After that, Martin’s death was framed as him being the “bad” guy and Zimmerman was helpless but to defend himself.

So, when white people ask “I’m white. Does that make me bad?” what they are REALLY saying is, “I’m white. Are you going to hold me to same simplistic, binary judgement system I hold you to?”

Bolding for truth

Did you or your parents see Lucy? The words written on the wall are there because it's a storage room of an old grocery store. The gangsters Lucy fights are Korean, not Taiwanese. Nothing about the movie suggests that all of Taiwan or Taipei is dangerous writ large and full of crime. The movie does have problems with race, but I think you may have jumped to some extreme conclusions about its portrayal of Taiwan based solely on the trailer.

seriouslystella:

unseenphil:

leafstranger:

isanah:

OK, look. I’m going to be nice because at least you’re not coming in here with whitefem nonsense like ellerhineart did yesterday, but my patience is running low. You are the third person to come to me defending the movie. 

The point of trailers is to let people make judgments on whether or not they want to see the movie. I’ll agree that most of them may not be accurate, but based on the information I had on the movie, I’m not going to see it because surprise surprise, racist, and while I’m not going to say Taiwan is a paradise, it doesn’t have the issues portrayed in the movie, such as drugs or, guns. You know, based on the trailer.

And if you’ll excuse me, I don’t see why I should see the movie if I don’t like what I see in the previews. I don’t see why I have to explain to some random person why I don’t want to see a movie if it looks like it’ll portray a non-Western country, especially the one my family came from, poorly. I think I even addressed on my blog why questions like these minimize the concerns of Taiwanese and East Asians. But I just went and explained to you, because it’s morning and I’m trying to be nice.

Have a good day.

Not to mention, people saying, “But they’re KOREAN gangsters!!” really does not make it better; it’s still a movie with a focus on a white woman shooting asians. For that matter, why would (South?) Korean gangsters be operating in Taiwan? Given that the reaction to legitimate S.K. businesses trying to enter the market there is overwhelmingly negative, I cannot imagine that illegal business would be all that welcomed, either.

Not to mention that ‘Koreans are crooks and gangsters’ is a really, really unfortunate stereotype in certain other nearby countries that -really- doesn’t need any reinforcement by Hollywood.

Right? Like most Americans can even tell the difference between Taiwanese and Korean anyway. Either way, every Asian in this film only exists to serve as a prop. When they created this trailer, they wanted you to perceive Taiwan and the scenes set there a certain way. They wanted you to cheer that Lucy, a delicate white woman, was killing Asians in dirty, scary Asia. That’s how she proves her badassness, her strength, her “I’m so done with this” face. They have scenes in Paris in this film, too, and none of them made it into the trailer. Wonder why.

frenchfryempress:

stinkytofumaiden:

rin-tohsaka:

rin-tohsaka:

mingsonjia:

waitrose:

waitrose:

one of my favourite superstitions is this one they have in china where ghosts allegedly can’t turn corners, so in shanghai they built a bridge made entirely of 90° turns to ward off the evil spirits

i shit you not

image

By fascinating you mean nauseating, right? :P

AHAHAH I’m reading these like “oh… okaaaay… I mean if you REALLY want to interpret things that way for e-cred.” They’ll just have a crowd of actual Chinese people looking at em funny wondering how they managed to pull that out of their ass…

you could tell them “in chinese culture licking your own asshole is a rite of passage for a good marriage” and they’d believe you

deportallwhitepeople2k14:

:’(

quit telling koreans you like kpop. that shit not cute

xiaobaobabe:

srsly if you watch Lucy unfollow me block me don’t ever come back

transgayinfo:

Why I’m Still a Butch Lesbian

so-so-gender-fly:

First thing first: I HATE THIS BLOG POST.

Now that that is out of the way, I’ll explain why….

1. She is speaking over a community she doesn’t understand.

The first piece of evidence is in her us of the word “cisgendered.” I automatically can’t take her seriously. I do my best not to spend too much time in my academic ivory tower, and I do feel a tinge of pretension at having to call this linguistic issue out…but, in the same breath, I’m not sure it is too much to ask that a person be well-read on a subject matter that they are taking such a stark stand against. (Also, she drops a “genderqueers” in there and that is a big No No.) All that aside, the author of this post makes it painfully clear that she does not have a good understanding of nonbinary/genderqueer identities and how these terms operate for the people who use them when she repeatedly conflates masculinity/femininity and gender roles/stereotypes with the use of these identifiers. There are AFAB people who identify as both masculine and female. There are AFAB people who identify as NB/GQ and masculine. There are also plenty of AFAB people who identify as NB/GQ and feminine. Or a mix of both. Or neither. It is far too simplistic to infer that masculine women just stop being women because they are also masculine. Actually, it doesn’t even make sense. Also, there are plenty of AMAB people who are male and effeminate and then those who identify as trans feminine. NB/GQ identities have nothing to do with stereotypes surrounding masculinity and femininity. Or gender roles. When a cis woman to declares that her favorite hobby is weightlifting, she doesn’t know how to cook, and she has no desire to carry a child she is not forced out of her cisness or her relationship with womanhood. She is merely breaking some silly stereotypes constructed around what it means to be a “good” woman. However, if she wakes up one day and says to herself, “Self…I’m not convinced the gender binary is for me anymore,” well, then….WELCOME TO THE CLUB! I would also like to note that this in no way precludes this person from identifying with womanhood (**cough cough** like me **cough cough**). There are a lot of challenges facing cis women and even more facing trans women. Finding yourself more comfortable with a NB/GQ doesn’t mean you have to remove yourself from a sisterhood if you still find that it speaks for you. I also find that this line of thinking only furthers gender policing in all of its many forms….which in this case just calls to mind the cis gatekeeping of the trans community. The worst part of her argument are the essentialist terms she uses to defend her evidence. It’s toxic to rely on these ideas and only skews your own perception of people around you. She simultaneously claims that essential “woman” stereotypes don’t fit her, while suggesting that masculine women are going to be gay. STOP ASSERTING THAT THERE IS ANY RIGHT OR WRONG WAY TO BE ANY ONE THING. STOP IT.

2. She is waiting for someone else to do the hard part.

"Perhaps one day the gender binary will be dismantled totally, and we’ll all stop limiting our children by bringing them up as either males or females." 

Yup. Yeah. This is great. Want to know how we can get started on that? Stop writing essentialist bullshit blog posts about how you are ACTIVELY REJECTING A NONBINARY IDENTITY. If you truly believe in a future without the gender binary…you should maybe not talk to people about how important you think it it is. Maybe…just maybe….if nonbinary and genderqueer children had, I dunno…nonbinary and genderqueer people to look up to they could grow up with less depression and more self esteem. Maybe they could rip apart the binary for you. But, no…let’s spend more time focusing on the cisgender experience. Here is this wacky notion I have…cisgender kids could maybe find themselves looking up to trans people? Yeah? Yeah. They definitely could. What is this separate but equal role model nonsense?

3. She is perpetuating the myth that trans/nb/gq visibility can be reduced to a “trend.”

Trans and nonbinary identities are nothing if not ancient. Anytime I hear a person (accidentally, or otherwise) glorify the gender binary, my first thought is, “You’re a racist with a limited understanding of Western white supremacy.” Nonbinary identities are not new. Allow me to reiterate: NONBINARY IDENTITIES ARE NOT NEW. The relationship we (white people, as I am white), in 2014 living in the USA, have with gender is not indicative of what gender looked like prior to our arrival here. The binary is not what gender looked like in the nations of the people we enslaved, either. Transgender and nonbinary people have always been and will always be. Please don’t claim that you are “square” for choosing not to co opt something you have no intention of respecting. Please don’t encourage cis people to view trans identities as a trendy phase that has an end. Please don’t invalidate people’s lives. 

I have to admit that I have walked this line myself. When I first started to look inward and realize the possibility that there was more to my relationship with my gender than the binary could offer me, I struggled a lot. I would ask myself, “What’s so wrong with being both masculine and female?” or “Am I turning my back on my female community?” I’m not mad at myself for asking these questions. It was a part of my process. And asking myself these questions helped me learn that genderqueer and womanhood don’t have to be mutually exclusive. As masculine as I am, I am interpreted as a cis female when I leave the house. That’s a part of my experience that I can not remove myself from. It is my reality and discussing it/fighting against it/identifying with it does not make me any less genderqueer. In fact, it gives me insight into two lived experiences at once. That duality can be confusing and stressful, but it can also be incredibly enlightening and, I feel, makes for a complex and richly lived life.

As someone who is both AFAB and uses the term “lesbian”, I see a problem with others in my communities and the way we approach NB/GQ people. Let’s stop treating AFAB people outside of the binary like traitors. AFAB people notoriously take up too much space within trans/NB/GQ spaces. Our visibility is more accessible and our blatant discrimination less vicious than our trans sisters. I urge us within the community and cis women alike to appreciate that privilege (and to also push back against it, but that’s another blog post). I say appreciate, because with the safety afforded us we should not be shaming the people in our community against coming out. Ever notice that these sentiments are only ever coming from cis women? Cis men don’t typically feel betrayed by trans women or trans feminine people. And they aren’t known for being the first people to rally around them and offer them support. Perhaps some of the energy being spent on shaming or discouraging or invalidating AFAB nonbinary/genderqueer people could be redirected into support and visibility and safe places for trans women and trans feminine people. 

If a nonbinary/genderqueer identity is not for you…that’s cool. No one wants you to use words for yourself that you don’t find helpful. What this boils down to is: there is no good to be done by going out of your way to defend your cis-ness. I suggest you recognize the privilege you have by not having to live with the added pressure that can come with a non-cis identity. I especially suggest that you, in turn, offer more support to the trans/nonbinary/genderqueer people around you. 

paintdeath:

Kohei Nawa forms a cloud-like landscape made of foam

problackgirl:

*racist white boy voice* so i don’t find black girls attractive, it’s just a preference, are you gonna get mad at me for not liking pepperoni pizza????

homebeccer:

"oh my god stop criticizing young girls who like 50 Shades of Gray or Twilight you can’t tell them what they can and can’t read"

no we can’t but we have to protect young girls from mistaking abusive behavior for genuine affection at all costs

ruto:

銀河一武道会 by あああ

Sung Hee for Flaunt Magazine April 2014

Photographer: Yu Tsai
Stylist: Martina Nilsson 
Hair: John Ruggiero 
Makeup: Allan Avendaño 
Nails: Christina Aviles 

Straight? What’s straight? A line can be straight, or a street…but the heart of a human being?
Tennessee Williams from A Streetcar Named Desire (via violentwavesofemotion)